Tracks featured or reposted by Synths of Eden during February and March of 2019. Follow this blog in Soundcloud to receive more in your feed.
From 29 to 31st of March happened in Hague, Netherlands, the 9th edition of the Rewire festival, which annually brings groundbreaking music performances and enriches the Dutch public debate about what they call adventurous music in a world each time more over saturated with what can be called “concrete music”, “carved in stone”. What has been typically known as the record, invented in the early 20th century. At first, massively reproduced in vinyl phonographs, it has been followed by cassettes tapes and CDs. Music has become digitized as everything else, stored on “clouds” and digitally distributed to consumers via streaming, free and paid downloads. Nowadays music is part of the famous big data. Some critical theory abstract institutions like mass media or industry of culture, are here represented by the music industry, which changed a lot in one century, as much as the whole music experience itself. Though music itself remains the same. Either it’s a church chorus, a group of drummers playing on a broad avenue’s corner or the 80s pop song playing inside your local grocery shop.
This year, Rewire sought to answer questions such as what characterizes liveness when most of the music we listen to come through the means of communication. Where the music experience also aims to fit a capitalist demand to generate profit in large scales, selling records or attracting big crowds to live concerts in stadiums. Therefore, some of the questions are: What is the artist’s role in the contemporary music live performances? In contrast to the music composed, recorded and produced in a studio. How can artists face these rapid shifts of new music instruments, methods of creating and processing sounds into music? How can those new techniques impact our experience of watching live music?
The whole pop music scene is marked by a concrete musicality that can only be performed in a few specific ways, such as dance or visual elements, such as pictures, videos, DJ sets and playback singing.
Those are some of the questions I also tried to answer myself when I first started to compose and produce my music back in 2015. For example, if I learned how to play a traditional instrument, such as acoustic or electric guitar, how could I ever perform electronic compositions made by MIDI technology on a laptop, through a DAW? Specially not having a band or group that could aid me in that process.
My attempt to answer those questions only brought me more questions about music-making and performance in the 21st century. It seemed to me that watching a live concert of electronic music where the so-called DJ/producers would merely stay in front of the crowd mixing their own tracks with other famous hits, while a massive public would appreciate their music exactly how it’s been produced in studio, without any type of flexibility, shown improvisation or music skills being deconstructed to the public. A scenario extremely opposed to that one of jazz.
Where would all the jams go? That would not be the kind of concert I wanted to make myself. Certainly, associating DJ sets with a poor live performance over simplifies everything, as also DJ sets can change and adapt songs to a crowd, which is something characteristic to pop and dance music. Some stunning performances can also result from DJ sets, just imagine all the underground techno and dance clubs out there that take this experience to its limitations every week all around the world. The whole pop music scene is marked by a concrete musicality that can only be performed in a few specific ways, such as dance (contemporary, ballet), visual elements, such as pictures, videos, DJ sets and playback singing.
The good thing about arts is that all the possibilities are open to experimentation. There are no limitations for artists’ creations and each individual is unique.
My 2016 me refused to accept what could be a live performance of concrete music, I would not just press play on my singles in a one hour long gig, so I started to learn Ableton Live and how to deconstruct my songs into small samples that could be applied to live improvisations. Realistically, all those singles played in a row would not last longer than 20 minutes. I incorporated to my live set some other pop-elements typical of DJ sets, such as Björk’s vocals and synthesizer saved with pre-sets that I could improvise with, while playing my drum loops. Ultimately, it was a live PA with DJ set influences.
After all, the gig was not successful, due to a lack of public and experience on my side, but it taught me how it is possible to overcome the limitations imposed by producing music on studios and how to perform them alive. A lot has happened since then, for instance, my latest album has just been released. Which has has been performed, broadcasted and recorded in less than one hour on 20th of March, which forced me to work fast, on a limited amount time, making use of a drum machine and an electric guitar containing three different pedals, not more than that. Two weeks after releasing “Nada Como Um Dia Após o Outro Dia” and attending Rewire, I could not be more certain about the existence of multiple possibilities for music performance in the 21st century, from a more concrete type of performance to a more flexible and improvised one. The good thing about arts is that all the possibilities are open to experimentation. There are no limitations for artists’ creations and each individual is unique.
“One might subsume the eliminated element in the term “aura” and go on to say: that which withers in the age of mechanical reproduction is the aura of the work of art. This is a symptomatic process whose significance points beyond the realm of art. One might generalize by saying: the technique of reproduction detaches the reproduced object from the domain of tradition. By making many reproductions it substitutes a plurality of copies for a unique existence. And in permitting the reproduction to meet the beholder or listener in his own particular situation, it reactivates the object reproduced. These two processes lead to a tremendous shattering of tradition which is the obverse of the contemporary crisis and renewal of mankind. Both processes are intimately connected with the contemporary mass movements”. Walter Benjamin, The Work or Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, 1935. Pt. II
Moreover, music experience is something much broader than a single record or live performance. Liveness itself, as a concept, can be found everywhere and there are dozens of possibilities for liveness to occur. Which brings me to Adam Harper, author of Infinite Music, and some of his considerations presented at Rewire. Liveness consists of four different elements: 1. The Sound, 2. The Stage, 3. The Moment and 4. The Body. Music can happen in expositions, for example, marking the importance of the stage for liveness. For that, he presents cases such as the Philips Pavillion, happened in 1958. Or merely as graphic content, such as Cornelius Cardew‘s notations or the French medieval book Roman de Fauvel. These are cases where people interact with music without necessarily attending to performances, but merely as reading and interacting with visual information. Summing up, music experience is all about aura, as explained by Walter Benjamin in The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, essay from 1935 (quotation above).
Many things can happen after the performer press play on his music, just like with pop music artists, nothing unusual…
During his talk, Harper mentions the role of the body and how it is an essential part of liveness. Which I could verify watching John Bence’s (from Nicolas Jaar’s label Other People) performance that happened minutes after that debate. Bence makes concrete music by definition, his performance happened in Hague’s old catholic church and visitors arriving to watch him perform could immediately notice the lack of music instruments. In the churche’s altar we could identify a laptop, two concert sized loud speakers and nothing else. His performance started with him bowing down to the audience and pressing play on his laptop, which caused ambient music to start playing while he would warm up starring seriously at his laptop’s screen. He later stands up and reacts to the sounds of his own music, singing the vocals on a playback, moving his arms on the rhythm of sounds. It was a truly ritualistic performance of his music inside a church. Which was aided by other non-auditive elements, like the lighting effects behind the altar, causing the colours to change, illumining the usual catholic paintings in the background. Confirming what Adam Harper mentioned about the body’s role in music. Many things can happen after the performer press play on his music, just like pop music artists, nothing unusual…
(to be continued in the second part)
Today we are updating our playlist Synthwave in Eden with a new addition, this time another one of those synthwave tracks that I admire, that sound like a progressive rock, or something done in the 70s, with synthesizers combined with studio innovation, different pattern of drums and a bassline full of groove. Everything in this track sound great, though the title inevitably has a negative connotation. Listening to Waiting for That Inevitable Bad Thing to Happen shows out to be something good to my ears, so it’s kind of ironic. Thanks Robert Random, composer/producer from Finland, for providing us with this great material. He’s going to release his full album on the 26th of March 2019. The other track in this single is Bad Thing Afterparty, it has a more techno influence, more underground, Streets of Rage soundtrack style, also with a great bassline.
I have been receiving several stunning techno submissions to share in our playlist Synths of Techno and here in the blog, so today I decided to make a single big post about techno, gathering 5 new remarkable releases I have curated for you. It is also important to register that now our techno playlist is now receiving submissions via Soundplate.
- D Formation – Nerve
- Komfortrauschen – Stanze
- The Alexsander – Susa
- Ge Bruny – Orion
- Vilas Monnappa – Faux
D Formation – Nerve was released by MIR Music, on 4th of February. It’s the label’s first release. D Formation is an experienced Spanish producer, usually well featured in Beatport for the Progressive House category, he shows us a bit of the best that progressive house as a genre can offer us. However, it’s a genre that in itself is very close to a more progressive and dark techno. Which deserves a place in this playlist as well. The vocals can certainly be considered psychedelic.
The second track is Stanze, by a German trio, called Komfortrauschen. It’s a more minimalistic techno, making use of electric guitar, drums and bass, summed by synthesizers. It’s been released by Otake Records.
A rocket launching pad inextricably tangled with an electric guitar, bass and drums. The cold wires, cables, pedals, beats fuse with living hands to come alive. Euphoric yet still sober, urgent and demanding yet sill relaxed and calm, contemplative and deep yet free and light – the appropriate soundtrack for meditative courtship behaviour in a bare concrete room. Always played live but with the aesthetics of a DJ set – that’s Komfortrauschen, a three piece live minimal techno band from Berlin.
Next I have selected Susa, by Swedish producer The Alexsander. That has some of his inspirations Vangelis and Michelangelo alike. Another minimalistic and organic style of techno, with a deep ambient touch. Amazing cover art, that is something that stands out, as much as his music. Susa has been released as a 5 tracks EP called Signal of Susa released by Awal Recordings on the first of February.
Next one was made by Brazilian producer Ge Brunny, called Orion. Also released by MIR Music, which explains the same design for the cover art as Nerve. A beautiful piece, is starts aggressive, energetic, with high percussion sounds, on a fast tempo, that collide on an amazing drop, that later grows slowly, again. It’s clear how he got inspired by stars. The sound design is primal, as much as the final audio quality, my best regards for the audio engineers involved. It’s been released as a three tracks single, containing astrological names Orion, Titan and Ufos. Another one that can be framed as Progressive House.
Lastly there’s a Faux by Vilas Monnappa, from Bangalore, India. Minimalistic in the rhythm, but with a pretty arrangement and melody. The sound was finely designed, great work with synthesizers. You can say it’s techno by how the beats sound, together with the work of bass, we can also say it’s been hardly influenced by Progressive House.
For more techno check our playlist Synths of Techno: